Evaluating the role of intellectual capital in the effect of the productivity impulse on macroeconomic components: the approach of the dynamic equilibrium financial model with an emphasis on recursive preferences

Authors

1 Department of economics, Faculty of economics and management, Shiraz branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Economic, Faculty of Economic and Management, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

In view of the limitations of recent modeling in Iran's economy, especially in financial economics, where behaviors contrary to economic theories had observed, the gap of participation of intellectual capital in economic models is significant, likewise, the recursive preferences function under rational expectations has been the focus of many financial experts. Due to the fact that modeling such functions requires solving complex mathematical relationships, researchers often refuse to use them. The present study, in the framework of a random dynamic model, tries to analyze the effect of productivity impulse on the macroeconomic components of the country by considering recursive preferences in the household model and presenting the firm model under two types of physical and intellectual capital, emphasizing the role of intellectual capital. The statistical population of this study is Iran's economic data in the period from 1996 to 2017. The model parameters had extracted as a combination of calibration and Bayesian using Dynare package in MATLAB software. The aforementioned general equilibrium model had designed in the form of neoclassical economic theories. Based on the results, the highest average difference between the leveraged returns of physical capital and intellectual capital belongs to the base scenario in which three factors including heterogeneous productivity of capital products, long-term productivity risk and intellectual capital were taken into account. This result shows the importance of the intellectual capital contribution in the model to justify market events and productivity impulse effects. Generally, the results showed that economic realities are explainable only under a recursive preferences function and high relative risk aversion combined with the separation of capital components.

Keywords

References

 
1. Adrian, T., Crump, R. K., & Moench, E. (2015), “Regression-based estimation of dynamic asset pricing models”, Journal of Financial Economics, 118(2), 211-244.
2. Ai, H., Croce, M. M., & Li, K. (2014), “Toward a quantitative general equilibrium asset pricing model with intangible capital”, The Review of Financial Studies, 26(2), 491-530.
3. Ai, H., & Kiku, D. (2013), “Growth to value: Option exercise and the cross section of equity returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 107(2), 325-349
4. Arrighetti, A., Landini, F., & Lasagni, A. (2014), “Intangible assets and firm heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy”, Research Policy, 43(1), 202-213.
5. Attanasio, O. P., & Browning, M. (1993), “Consumption over the Life Cycle and over the Business Cycle (No. w4453), National Bureau of Economic Research.‏
6. Basu, S., & Waymire, G. (2008), “Has the importance of intangibles really grown? And if so, why? ”, Accounting and Business Research, 38(3), 171-190.
7. Basu, S. (1977), “Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price‐earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis”, The journal of Finance, 32(3), 663-682.
8. Berk, J. B., & Van Binsbergen, J. H. (2016), “Assessing asset pricing models using revealed preference”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), 1-23.
9. Black, A. J., & Fraser, P. (2003), “The value premium: rational, irrational or random”, Managerial Finance, 29(10), 57-75.
10. Breeden, D. T. (2005), “An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities”, In Theory of valuation, 5(3), pp.
53-96.‏
11. Chen, Z., Cooper, I., Ehling, P., & Xiouros, C. (2018), “Risk aversion sensitive real business cycles”, Available at SSRN 2158064.
12. Constantinides, G. M. (1990), “Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle”, Journal of political Economy, 98(3), 519-543.
13. Croce, M. M. (2014), “Long-run productivity risk: A new hope for production-based asset pricing?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 66, 13-31.
14. Dreman, D. N., & Lufkin, E. A. (2000), “Investor overreaction: evidence that its basis is psychological”, The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(1), 61-75.
15. Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (2013), “Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework”, In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (pp. 207-239).
16. Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1991), “Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis”, Journal of political Economy, 99(2), 263-286.
17. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992), “The cross‐section of expected stock returns”, The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
18. Jaffe, J., Keim, D. B., & Westerfield, R. (1989), “Earnings yields, market values, and stock returns”, The Journal of Finance, 44(1), 135-148.
19. Han, D., & Han, I. (2014), “Prioritization and selection of intellectual capital measurement indicators using analytic hierarchy process for the mobile telecommunications industry”, Expert Systems with applications, 26(4), 519-527.
20. Hall, R. (1988), “Intertemporal substitution in consumption”, Journal of Political Economy, 96, 339-57.
21. Hosseinzade yousefabad s.m., mehrara m, tavakkolian , h.(2018) “the role of national development fund in reducing iran’s economic fluctuations based on dsge approach” journal of financial economics, 41(11); 1 -41.
22. Jeong, D., Kim, H., & Park, J. Y. (2015), “Does ambiguity matter? Estimating asset pricing models with a multiple-priors recursive utility”, Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 361-382.
23. Vissing-Jørgensen, A. (2002), “Limited asset market participation and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution”, Journal of political Economy, 110(4), 825-853.‏
24. Kreps, D. M., & Porteus, E. L. (1978), “Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory”, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society,
185-200.
25. Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1982), “Time to build and aggregate fluctuations”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1345-1370.
26. Lev, B. (2000), Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting, Brookings institution press.
27. Lucas Jr, R. E. (1978), “Asset prices in an exchange economy”, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1429-1445.‏
28. Ludvigson, S. C. (2013), “Advances in consumption-based asset pricing: Empirical tests”, In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 799-906).
29. Elsevier. ‏Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985), “The equity premium: A puzzle”, Journal of monetary Economics, 15(2), 145-161.
30. Marr, B., & Schiuma, G. (2001), “Measuring and managing intellectual capital and knowledge assets in new economy organisations”, Handbook of performance measurement, Gee, London, 369-411.
31. Rapach, D., & Tan, F. (2019), “Bayesian Estimation of Macro-Finance DSGE Models with Stochastic Volatility”, Available at SSRN 3469356.
32. Romer, D. (2006), Advanced macroeconomics, 3rd edition Mcgraw-hill.
33. Roshan, R. (2019), “Separation and Computation of Relative Risk Aversion and Elasticity of Inter Temporal Substitution: Recursive Preferences and Dynamic Programming Approach”,‏ quarterly journal of economical modeling, 13(45), 159-182.
34. Roy, R., & Shijin, S. (2018), “A six-factor asset pricing model”, Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(3), 205-217.
35. Tavakoliyan, H., & Sarem, M. (2016), “DSGE Models in DAYNARE”, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, 21.
36. Thimme, J. (2017), “Intertemporal substitution in consumption: A literature review”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1), 226-257.
37. Tsai, C. F., Lu, Y. H., & Yen, D. C. (2012), “Determinants of intangible assets value: The data mining approach”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 31, 67-77.
38. Weil, P. (1989), “The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle”, Journal of monetary economics, 24(3), 401-421.
Journal of Economic Essays; an Islamic Approach
Volume 18, Issue 35 - Serial Number 35
October 2021
Pages 249-277

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics