A methodological approach to economic action

Author

Assistant Professor, Philosophy of Humanities, Research Institute and University, Qom, Iran

Abstract

The discussion of economic action at the level of economic schools is one of the most vital topics that every economic school necessarily has a view on. For this reason, in a comparative study, we have traced the position of this debate in the capitalist and Islamic economic schools. In this regard, the main goal is to examine the theoretical accuracy and negation quality and to prove the propositions needed to prove the theory of economic action. This discussion connects us with the big issue under the title of presuppositions of scientific approaches that there is a methodological ambiguity in how to prove them in the history of science. In this article, by reporting and evaluating the basic theory in the Austrian school and the Islamic school, we showed the similarities and differences of these two theories at the content level and at the method level. In this review, it became clear that this basic theory in Islamic economics fulfills the epistemological ideals both in terms of content and method, which is not available in the Austrian school. This theoretical ability is a result of the methodological unity and comprehensive global view that the Islamic ijtihad approach has towards knowledge. A methodological unity that also opens up the historical ambiguity of science regarding the way of checking the assumptions.

Keywords

References

  1. حسنی، سیدحمیدرضا و هادی موسوی (1397)، انسان‌کنش‌شناسی صدرایی، قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
  2. صدر، سیدمحمدباقر (1382)، مبانی منطقی استقراء. قم: یمین.
  3. ________ (1421)، المدرسة القرآنیة موسوعة الشهید الصدر، قم: مرکز الأبحاث والدراسات التخصّصیة للشهید الصدر.
  4. ________ (1421ب)، دروس فی علم الاصول، قم: مرکز الأبحاث والدراسات التخصّصیة للشهید الصدر.
  5. ________ (1433)، اقتصادنا، قم: دار الصدر: مرکز الابحاث و الدراسات التخصّصیة للشهید الصدرv.
  6. عابدی شاهرود، علی (1394)، نقد قوه شناخت، تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.

 

  1. Göçmen, D. (2007), The Adam Smith Problem. LONDON, NEW YORK: Tauris Academic Studies.
  2. Gordon, D. (2000), An Introduction to Economic Reasoning. Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  3. Machlup , F. (1978), Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. London: Academic Press.
  4. Mises, L. v. (1949), Human Action Treatise on Economics. San Francisco: Yale University.
  5. Mises, L. v. (1959), SOCIALISM An Economic and Sociological. N E W H A V E N: Y A L E U N I V E R S I T Y P R E S S.
  6. Robertson, J. M. (1892), The Fallacy of Saving A STUDY IN ECONOMICS. London: SWAN SONNENSCHEIN & CO.
  7. Smith, A. (1977), An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of theThe Wealth of Nations. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
  8. Smith, A. (2004), The theory of Moral Sentiment. UK: CAMBRIDGE.
  9. Snowdon, J. (2015), Accumulating too much stuff: what is hoarding and what is not? Australasian Psychiatry, 1−4.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics