The Impact of Fintech on the Welfare of Rural Households in Iran

Author

Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Boroujerd, Iran

Abstract

Fintech is one of the financial innovations that affects the development of financial markets, the growth of financial institutions, and the provision of financial services which leads to the creation of new products, new business models, and new applications. Fintech has different effects on the welfare of urban and rural households according to society's access level to other financial services. On the one hand, fintech leads to an increase in economic development and welfare of households through the reduction of information asymmetry, efficient allocation of financial resources, the reduction of financing cost, the accumulation of capital, and the increase in the individual education level. On the other hand, fintech reduces economic development and the household's welfare by increasing risk and negatively affecting financial regulations. During the last two decades, Iran's economy has experienced significant growth in the fintech industry along with the expansion of technology and information infrastructure, the development of the internet, and financial services. Therefore, analyzing the impact of fintech on rural households' welfare as an index to reflect the purchasing power and the ability to acquire living facilities is of special necessity. Despite this, the role and importance of fintech on rural households’ welfare has not been examined in any of the country's research. Considering the importance of the subject, the main goal of the present essay is to investigate the effect of fintech on the welfare of rural households in the provinces of Iran from 2014 to 2020 using the econometric approach of panel data.
Method: In the research model specification, welfare was considered a function of fintech, economic growth, financial development, government spending, and trade openness. Also, two indices of the Sen and Engel coefficient were used to measure the variable of rural households’ welfare. The research area includes Iran’s provinces and covers annual time series data for 2014 to 2020. The consumer price index in the base year 2016 was applied to convert the nominal data to real. Since in the present research, the number of cross−sections is more than the length of the time series period, to estimate the model and investigate the effect of fintech on rural households’ welfare, the panel generalized method of moments approach was used. In the panel GMM, the dependent variable with a lag is entered into the model as an explanatory variable along with other independent variables, which solves the problem of serial autocorrelation and, due to the use of the method of moment estimators remove the heteroskedasticity problem. Specifications such as the disappearance of the variable's endogeneity and the effectiveness of both fixed and random effects in model estimation make the dynamic panel model approach preferable to other static patterns.
Results: The findings show that fintech has a positive effect on social welfare and a negative impact on the Engel coefficient. The fintech growth leads to an increase in entrepreneurship and household income by reducing borrowing costs and access to financial services and increasing the non−food consumption of goods. Economic growth has a positive effect on social welfare growth and a negative influence on the Engel coefficient. Improving economic growth by increasing income and non−food consumption expenditures enhances social welfare and reduces the Engel coefficient. Financial development has a negative influence on social welfare growth and a positive effect on the Engel coefficient. The inefficiency of the financial systems in Iran leads to a decrease in the non−food consumption goods and a decrease in welfare by reducing economic growth and individual real income. The government expenditure per capita growth has a positive effect on social welfare growth and a negative impact on the Engel coefficient. Increasing government spending through increasing productivity leads to improved income and welfare growth. The degree of trade openness has a positive effect on social welfare growth and a negative influence on the Engel coefficient. Increasing the degree of trade openness through the transfer of knowledge and improving technology leads to an increase in income and non−food consumption, and as a result, an increase in welfare.
Discussion and Conclusions: Expanding access to credit is considered one of the most important factors to reduce poverty and improve the welfare of rural households. In such a way, access to credit by increasing income and smoothing consumption increases the welfare of poor rural households. Fintech leads to an increase in rural households' access to financial credit by providing innovative business models and new methods of financial intermediation. Upsurging access to financial credit leads to an expansion in entrepreneurship and raises investment in the human capital of individuals living in rural areas. Increasing entrepreneurship in rural areas and increasing investment in human capital also leads to increased employment, raised income, and growth in the welfare of rural households. Although the concentration of banks and other traditional financial institutions in urban areas has hindered the participation and investment of rural households in the financial markets, However fintech, by taking advantage of the advances and innovations in the field of technology, such as the internet, mobile phones, and artificial intelligence, has caused the remove of location barriers, raised quick and easy access to financial services, reduced information asymmetry, and declined transaction costs which in turn provides the possibility of participation and investment of individuals living in rural areas in financial markets. In such a way, poor rural individuals with small savings can also participate in the economy's financial sector. Participation and investment in the economy’s financial sector lead to an increase in profitability and income and, as a result, an increase in the welfare of rural households. Considering the significant consequence of fintech on the welfare of rural households, it is recommended that the government adopts comprehensive policies, including the creation of regulatory laws to direct fintech, increasing investment in mobile phone and internet infrastructure to increase rural households access to the internet, increasing investment in the field of artificial intelligence, and ultimately training rural households to use the benefits of artificial intelligence.

Keywords


  1. ابونوری، اسمعیل و عباسی‌قادری، رضا (1386). برآورد اثر رشد اقتصادی بر فقر در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهشهای اقتصادی ایران، 9(30)، 23−
  2. احسانی، محمدعلی و ایزدی، رضا (1398). تأثیر شفافیت بانک مرکزی بر تلاطم تولید. مدلسازی اقتصادی. 13(3)، 35−
  3. اسماعیل‎پورمقدم، هادی، و کرمی، آرزو (1400). اثر نوآوری فین‎تک بر رشد سبز در ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران. 10(39)، 11−
  4. حسینی، سیده‌مریم و نجفی، سیدعباس (1388). توزیع درآمد در مناطق روستایی و شهری ایران(1386−1363). مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 1(3)، 147−
  5. دژپسند، فرهاد و بخارایی، ریحانه (1395). بررسی رابطه توسعه مالی و رشد اقتصادی در ایران بر اساس الگوی اقتصاد ک(لان پساکینزی. فصلنامه اقتصاد مالی و توسعه، 10(34)، 92−
  6. سوری، علی (1400). اقتصاد سنجی جلد دوم: پیشرفته و جلد سوم: تکمیلی. تهران: نور علم.
  7. شاه‎آبادی، ابوالفضل، خوش‎طینت، بهناز، میرغیاثی، مهدی، و مرادی، علی (1398). تأثیر توسعه بخش بانکی بر رفاه اجتماعی استان‎های ایران. دو فصلنامه مطالعات و سیاستهای اقتصادی، 6(2)، 105−
  8. شهیکی‎تاش، محمدنبی، مولایی، صابر، و دینارزهی، خدیجه (1393). بررسی ارتباط رشد اقتصادی و ضریب رفاه اجتماعی در ایران بر اساس رهیافت بیزین. فصلنامه پژوهشهای رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 4(16)، 41−
  9. صادقی، حسین و داودی، آزاده (1390). آثار مخارج دولت بر نرخ فقر روستایی در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهشها و سیاستهای اقتصادی، 19(58)، 107−
  10. صمدی، سعید، نصرالهی، خدیجه، و کرمعلیان سیچانی، مرتضی (1386). بررسی رابطه بین توسعه بازارهای مالی و رشد اقتصادی. فصلنامه پژوهشهای اقتصادی، 6(3)، 1−
  11. کوچک‎پور، نجمه، مزیکی، علی، و فرجادی، غلامعلی (1395). بررسی اثر بازشدن تجاری و مالی بر فقر. فصلنامه برنامهریزی و بودجه، 21(4)، 47−
  12. کشاورز حداد، غلامرضا (1396). اقتصادسنجی دادههای خرد و ارزیابی سیاست. چاپ دوم، تهران: نشر نی.
  13. مریدی، زینب، فتاحی، شهرام، و سهیلی، کیومرث (1399). تأثیر توسعه بازار سهام بر دهک‌های بالا و پایین درآمد. راهبرد مدیریت مالی، 8(28)، 1−
  14. نعمتی، غلامرضا، علیزاده، محمد، فطرس، محمدحسن، خداوردی سامانی، مریم، و کبیری، دینا (1401). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر رفاه اجتماعی ایران تحت نااطمینانی: رویکرد متوسط‌گیری بیزی. اقتصاد باثبات، 3(1)، 61−
  15. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations". Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
  16. Appiah−Otoo, I., & Song, N. (2021). "The Impact of Fintech on Poverty Reduction: Evidence from China." Sustainability, 13(9), 5225.
  17. Badwan, N., & Awad, A. (2022). "The Impact of Financial Technological Advancement (FinTech) on the Economic Growth: Evidence from Palestine". Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(23), 50−
  18. Baltagi, B. (2008). "Econometric Analysis of Panel Data". 5th John Wiley & Sons Publication. USA.
  19. Boukhatem, J. (2016). "Assessing the Direct Effect of financial development on poverty reduction in a Panel of low−and middle−income Countries". Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 214−‏
  20. Bu, Y., Yu, X., & Li, H. (2022). "The nonlinear impact of FinTech on the real economic growth: evidence from China". Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1−‏
  21. Deng, X., Huang, Z., & Cheng, X. (2019). "FinTech and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China based on P2P Data". Sustainability, 11(22), 6434.
  22. Fauzi, F., and R. Rokhim. (2022). "Impact of FinTech lending on poverty reduction evidence from Indonesia. Sustainable Future: Trends, Strategies and Development". Routledge, 148−‏
  23. Gloede, O., & Rungruxsirivorn, O. (2013). "Local financial development and household welfare: Microevidence from Thai households". Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(4), 22−‏
  24. S., Sharma, R. B., & Chouhan, V. (2022). "Impact of Financial Technology (Fintech) on Financial Inclusion (FI) in Rural India". Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(2), 483–497.
  25. Greene, H. (2000). "Econometric Analyse". 4th Edition, London: Prentice−Hall International (UK) Limited.
  26. Le, M. S. (2014). "Trade openness and household welfare within a country: A microeconomic analysis of Vietnamese households". Journal of Asian Economics, 33, 56−‏
  27. Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges". Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46.
  28. Lee, C. C., Li, X., Yu, C. H., & Zhao, J. (2021). "Does fintech innovation improve bank efficiency? Evidence from China’s banking industry". International Review of Economics & Finance, 74, 468–483.
  29. Levin, A., Lin, C., & Chu, C. J. (2002). "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite- sample properties". Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
  30. Luo, S., Sun, Y., & Zhou, R. (2022). "Can fintech innovation promote household consumption? Evidence from China family panel studies". International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102137.‏
  31. Munyegera, G. K., & Matsumoto, T. (2016). "Mobile Money, Remittances, and Household Welfare: Panel Evidence from Rural Uganda". World Development, 79, 127–137.
  32. Nasution, L. N., Ramli, Sadalia, I., & Ruslan, D. (2022). "Investigation of Financial Inclusion, Financial Technology, Economic Fundamentals, and Poverty Alleviation in ASEAN−5: Using SUR Model". ABAC Journal, 42(3), 132−‏
  33. Nugraha, M. K. R., & Handra, H. (2021). "The Relationship between Government Debt and Social Welfare". Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(1), 125−
  34. Shokhrukh, S. (2020). "A Case Study of Mobile Money as a Tool of Fintech for Financial Inclusion and Poverty Reduction in Kenya: Lessons for Uzbekistan". PhD Thesis. Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University.‏
  35. Sikalao−Lekobane, O. L. (2022). "The Impact of FinTech Credit on Financial Stability: An Empirical Study". Doctoral Thesis (Doctoral). Bournemouth University.
  36. Song, N., Appiah−Otoo, I. (2022). "The Impact of Fintech on Economic Growth: Evidence from China." Sustainability, 14(10), 6211.
  37. Thanh, P. T., Saito, K., & Duong, P. B. (2019). "Impact of microcredit on rural household welfare and economic growth in Vietnam". Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(1), 120–139.
  38. Utami, Y. (2022). "Analysis of the impact of financial technology (fintech) on the Indonesian economy in the new normal era". International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(4). 1−
  39. Wang, X., & Guangwen He, G. (2020). "Digital Financial Inclusion and Farmers’ Vulnerability to Poverty: Evidence from Rural China". Sustainability, 12(4), 1668.
  40. Ye, Y., Chen, S., & Li, C. (2022). "Financial technology as a driver of poverty alleviation in China: Evidence from an innovative regression approach". Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(1), 100164.
  41. Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Wan, G., & Luo, Z. (2019). "Fintech, Growth, and Inequality: Evidence from China’s Household Survey Data". The Singapore Economic Review, 65, 75−
  42. Zuliansyah, A., Pratomo, D., & Supriyaningsih, O. (2022). "The Role of Financial Technology (Fintech) in ZIS Management to Overcome Poverty". Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 5(1), 203−‏