Presentation and Analysis of the Theme Network of Challenges and Solutions for Implementing Shariah Supervision in Iran's Capital Market

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Finance, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D Student, Department of Finance, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

3 Master’s Student, Department of Finance, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Shariah governance and supervision are key components of Islamic financial markets and institutions. This supervision not only ensures compliance with Islamic principles but also plays a crucial role in enhancing market transparency and financial integrity. Internationally, organizations such as the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) and the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) have developed standards for governance and Sharia supervision, which have strengthened public trust in Islamic financial markets. Shariah supervision in Iran's capital market began in 2007 with the approval of the guidelines for establishing and operating the Specialized Fiqh Committee of the Securities and Exchange Organization. This committee has made significant efforts to align the capital market with Shariah principles; however, the implementation of Shariah supervision still faces numerous challenges, highlighting the need to identify, analyze, and propose appropriate solutions for these challenges. This study first examines the theoretical foundations of Sharia supervision and then, through semi-structured interviews with experts and the thematic analysis method, presents the challenges and solutions for its implem entation in the form of a theme network, including the overarching, organizing, and basic levels. The aim of this research is to present and analyze the challenges and solutions for implementing Shariah supervision with the goal of improving Shariah supervision in Iran’s capital market.
Methodology: This research is qualitative and applied in nature, conducted using documentary studies and interviews with 12 experts, and the data were analyzed through the thematic analysis method. Thematic analysis is a method for identifying, analyzing, and organizing qualitative patterns that transform scattered data into structured information. The research uses the theme network as an analytical framework, which includes three levels of basic, organizing, and overarching themes. To answer the research question regarding the challenges and solutions for implementing Shariah supervision in Iran's capital market, the following steps were undertaken:

Design and revision of interview questions based on documentary study.
Semi-structured interviews with 12 experts using purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved.
Data analysis using MAXQDA 2020 software and extraction of themes at three levels.
Review of themes in four stages, with no changes in the last two rounds, achieving theoretical saturation.
Extraction of 893 final codes, including 2 overarching codes (diagnosis and solutions), 32 organizing themes, and 176 basic themes.

Visualization and analysis of the theme network to provide a structured overview of the challenges and solutions for Shariah supervision.
Results: The findings indicate that the main challenges can be grouped into 15 key areas, including the structure of the current Shariah supervision model, scope of supervision, composition and tenure of members, conflict of interest, mechanisms for replacing and terminating members, the process of reviewing issues, education and cultural development, the performance of the Fiqh Secretariat, the performance of the Islamic Studies Department, the performance of the Sub-committee on Capital Market in Qom, evaluation of new financial instruments, responding to Fiqh doubts, training and retention of human resources, communication and interactions, and the qualification of members. The study also proposes solutions corresponding to each of these challenges. Some of these solutions include establishing mechanisms for the use of Shariah consultants, expanding the scope of supervision, implementing post-supervision, formalizing the qualification of committee members, planning for the improvement of Islamic and Shariah financial literacy among investors, creating a Shariah accountability system, and improving the structure and performance of task forces.
Discussion and Conclusions: The analysis of the research findings indicates that in order to improve the effectiveness of Shariah supervision in Iran’s capital market, it is essential to adopt appropriate solutions in each of these areas. Based on the research results, the policy and executive recommendations for improving Shariah supervision in Iran’s capital market include developing guidelines for Shariah consultants to ensure compliance with Shariah principles, creating a Shariah supervision index for ranking financial institutions and issuers, establishing a Shariah accountability system, and revising the guidelines for the formation and activities of the Shariah Committee of the Securities and Exchange Organization. Additionally, suggestions for increasing transparency in the processes of the Shariah Committee, managing conflicts of interest, requiring periodic performance reports, and enhancing international relations are included. Furthermore, establishing mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of Shariah Committee resolutions, creating a Shariah supervision checklist, and improving the implementation of Shariah principles in the capital market are also among the solutions that could help enhance the efficiency of Shariah supervision.
JEL Classification: G21, G29, Z12.
Acknowledgement: Gratitude and appreciation are extended to the Research, Development, and Islamic Studies Management of the Securities and Exchange Organization of Iran for their cooperation.

Keywords


  1. توحیدی، محمد؛ صبوری، علیرضا؛ رضائی هنجنی، محمدعلی و محمدرضا سید خالقی (1403). «شناسایی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های مهم در استقرار نظارت شرعی مطلوب در مؤسسات مالی اسلامی».فصلنامه علمی اقتصاد اسلامی 24(94): 79-116.
  2. توحیدی، محمد و علیرضا فتاحی. (1398). «استخراج مؤلفه‌های ارتقاء نظارت شرعی در بازار سرمایه ایران بر مبنای استانداردهای بین‌المللی (مطالعه موردی: استانداردهای بین‌المللی AAOIFI و IFSB)». فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار 12(47): 154-181.
  3. توحیدی، محمد و مریم محمودی (1401). «ارزیابی عملکرد کمیته تخصصی فقهی سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه علمی اقتصاد اسلامی». 23(89): 160-129.

doi: 10.30497/IES.2012.1103.

  1. عابدی جعفری، حسن؛ تسلیمی، محمدسعید؛ فقیهی، ابوالحسن و محمد شیخ‌زاده (1390). «تحلیل مضمون و شبکه مضامین: روشی ساده و کارآمد برای تبیین الگوهای موجود در داده های کیفی.» اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت) ، 5(10)، 151-198.
  2. فتاحی، علیرضا و شهاب خدابخشیان ‌ (1399). «راهکارهای ارتقای نظارت شرعی بازار سرمایه ج. ا. ا.»اقتصاد اسلامی،81 (21)، 56-97.
  3. فتاحی، علیرضا؛ مصباحی مقدم، غلام‌رضا و محمد توحیدی (1401). «آسیب‌شناسی نظارت شرعی بازار سرمایه جمهوری اسلامی ایران.» مجله معرفت اقتصاد اسلامی،13(2)، 57-78.
  4. پایگاه قوانین و مقررات بازار سرمایه ایران (1403). «دستورالعمل تشکیل و فعالیت کمیته تخصصی فقهی».

https://cmr.seo.ir/ShowRules?Id=10291&VersionId=82704&search

  1. مرکز پژوهش، توسعه و مطالعات اسلامی (اردیبهشت 1401). «اعضای دوره‌های پیشین کمیته تخصصی فقهی».

https://rdis.seo.ir/fa/category/list/39/

  1. مرکز پژوهش، توسعه و مطالعات اسلامی (مهر 1403). «اعضای کنونی کمیته تخصصی فقهی».

https://rdis.seo.ir/fa/category/list/38/

  1. میسمی، حسین و وهاب قلیچ (1389). «نظارت شرعی و ریسک شریعت در بانکداری اسلامی». فصلنامه تازه‌های اقتصاد، 136. 4-12.
  2. Abedi Jafari, Hassan, Taslimi, Mohammad Saeed, Faghihi, Abolhasan, and Sheikhzadeh, Mohammad. (2011). Thematic Analysis and Theme Network: A Simple and Effective Method for Explaining Patterns in Qualitative Data. Strategic Management Thought (Andisheh Modiriyat), 5(2 [Issue 10]), 151-198. [in Persian]
  3. Alnofli, A., & Engku Ali, E. R. A. (2020). The Role of Key Functions of Shariah Governance in Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs). International Journal of Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh Studies, 4(1), 98–107.

https: //doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v4i1.173

  1. Al-saadi, A., Hassan, M.K. & Alkhan, A.M. (2022), Shari’a Governance in Bahrain: Analysing the Islamic Banking Industry’s Implementation of the Newly Issued Regulatory Shari’a Governance Module, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10). 418.
  2. Attride-Stirling, Jennifer. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3). 385-405.
  3. Aznan, Hasan., Ruslan, Sabirzyanov. (2015). Optimal shari'ah governance model in islamic finance regulation. International Journal of Education and Research3(4), 243-258.
  4. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  5. Fattahi, A., & Khodabakhshian, S. (2021). Strategies for Promoting the Islamic Republic of Iran's Capital Market shariah supervision. Islamic Economics, 21(81), 65-97. [in Persian]
  6. Grassa, R. (2015), Shari'ah supervisory systems in Islamic finance institutions across the OIC member countries: an investigation of regulatory frameworks. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 23(2), 135-160.
  7. Hichem, Hamza. (2013). 5. Sharia governance in Islamic banks: effectiveness and supervision model. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-02-2013-0021
  8. Hussain Minhas, I. (2012). Shari'ah Governance Model (SGM) and its four basic pillars. Islamic Finance News Malaysia Published by Red Money Publication.
  9. IFSB (2014). Revised Guidance On Key Elements in The Supervisory Review Process of Institutions Offering Islamic Financial Services (Excluding Islamic Insurance (Takāful) Institutions And Islamic Collective Investment Schemes).
  10. Kamaruddin, M. I. H., Shafii, Z., Hanefah, M. M., Salleh, S., & Zakaria, N. (2024). Issues and Challenges in Shariah Audit Practices in Malaysian Shariah-Based Sectors. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, Vol. 21, No. 1. 82-100.
  11. Kamaruddin, M.I.H., Hanefah, M., Shafii, Z. and Salleh, S. (2020). Comparative analysis on Sharīʿah governance in Malaysia: SGF 2010, IFSA 2013 and SGPD 2019. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(1), 110-131.
  12. Masruki, R., Hanefah, M.M. and Dhar, B.K. (2020), Sharīʿah governance practices of Malaysian Islamic banks in the light of Sharīʿah compliance. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 13(1), 91-97.
  13. Md, kausar alam, fakir, tajul islam, mahfuza, kamal runy (2021). Why does Shariah governance framework important for Islamic banks? Asian Journal of Economics and Banking. 5(2), DOI: 10.1108/AJEB-02-2021-0018.
  14. Meisami, H., Musavian, S. A., Abdollahi, M., & Amrollahi, H. (2012). Comparison And Analysis Of The Experience Of Sharia Supervision For Islamic Banking In Other Countries: Lessons For Iran. [in Persian]
  15. Meisami, H., Qelich, W., (2010), Shariah Supervision and Shariah Risk in Islamic Banking. Journal of Economic Developments, Issue 136. [in Persian]
  16. Mohamad, S. and Sori, Z.M. (2016), Effectiveness of shariah committees in the Malaysian Islamic financial institutions: the practical perspective,MEI Insight IFS, 2, 1-8.
  17. Muhammad, Fakhrul, Arrazi. (2023). 1. Konsep shariah governance pada lembaga keuangan syariah. Jurnal hukum ekonomi syariah, doi: 10.59166/mizanuna.v1i2.134
  18. Prasojo, P., Yadiati, W., Fitrijanti, T., & Sueb, M. (2022). Do risk-taking and Shariah governance have a relationship with Maqasid Shariah-based performance?. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 10(1), 27-40.
  19. Regulations for the Formation and Activities of the Specialized Fiqh Committee (August 1, 2024). [in Persian]
  20. Research, Development, and Islamic Studies Center (Mehr 1403). Current Members of the Shariah Advisory Committee. [in Persian] https://rdis.seo.ir/fa/category/list/38/
  21. Research, Development, and Islamic Studies Center (Ordibehesht 1401). Members of the previous terms of the Fiqh Specialized Committee. [in Persian] https://rdis.seo.ir/fa/category/list/39/
  22. Saleh, A. O. H., Abdirasak, A., & Zakariyah, H. (2021). Shariah supervision controls of Islamic banks: A critical analytical study. In B. Alareeni, A. Hamdan, & I. Elgedawy (Eds.) , The importance of new technologies and entrepreneurship in business development (pp. 345-367). Springer.
  23. Saleh, A.O.H., Abdirasak, A., Zakariyah, H., & Taoufiq, E.A. (2024). Shariah Governance and Audit in the Islamic Banks: A Literature Review. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 11(2), 111-132. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10760-023-09655-6
  24. Sohail, aamir; ahmad, Munawa; khan, mubbsher Munawar (2021). An exploratory study to investigate the role of Shariah Governance in Islamic financial institutions: A case of Emerging Economy. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 12(10), 1366-1380.
  25. Sriani, E., & Habibah, I. (2024). THE ROLE OF THE SHARIA SUPERVISORY BOARD IN ENSURING CONTRACT COMPLIANCE IN SHARIA FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS'FINANCING Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 10(2), 198-207.
  26. Sueb, M., Prasojo, Muhfiatun, Syarifah, L., and Nur Anggara Putra, R. (2022). Shariah Board Characteristics, Risk-Taking, and Maqasid Shariah Affect an Islamic Bank's Performance. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(3), 89–101.
  27. The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Law (December 5, 2023). [in Persian]
  28. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [in Persian]
  29. The Sixth Five-Year Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2017–2021). [in Persian]
  30. Tohidi, M., & Fattahi, A. (2019). Parameters of Promotion of Shariah Supervision of Iran's Capital Market Base On International Shariah Supervision Standards by Thematic Analysis Approach (Case Study: International Standards IFSB & AAOIFI). Journal of Securities Exchange, 12(47), 154-181. [in Persian]
  31. Tohidi, M., & Mahmoudi, M. (2023). Evaluation of the performance of the shariah committee of Stock Exchange and Securities Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Islamic Economics, 23(89), 129-160. [in Persian]
  32. Tohidi, M., Saboori, A., Rezaei Hanjani, M., & Khaleghi, S. M. (2024). Identifying and analyzing the important components in the establishment of optimal Sharia supervision in Islamic financial institutions. Islamic Economics, 24(94). [in Persian]
  33. Triasari, D., & Zwart, F. De. (2021). The Legal Reform Policy on the Shariah Supervisory Board Role’s in Indonesian Shariah Banks. Bestuur, 9(2), 113–125.
  34. Uçar, A. M. (2024). Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). In M. Ustaoğlu & C. Çakmak (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Islamic Finance and Economics. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93703-4_146-1
  35. Yusuf, Sani, Abubakar. (2022). 2. Shariah Governance: Some Probable Challenges That May Be Faced By Shariah Committee (SC) At Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs). International Research Journal Of Shariah, Muamalat And Islam, doi: 10.35631/irjsmi.411001