Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Economic theory and international experience demonstrate that an effective tax system can reduce poverty, enhance social equity, generate stable government revenues, and mitigate budget deficits. However, Iran’s heavy reliance on oil revenues has historically diminished the urgency for tax system reforms. Under economic sanctions, neither oil revenues nor fiscal stability and social equity are in a favorable state. Furthermore, Iran’s current personal income tax system fails to meet the core criteria of an efficient tax system—namely, efficiency, equity, and simplicity.
In contrast, the comprehensive income tax model, implemented in many countries, offers a more equitable, efficient, and simplified alternative to Iran’s existing tax structure. This study seeks to (1) identify the prerequisites for implementing a comprehensive personal income tax system in Iran, (2) prioritize these requirements based on their significance, and (3) determine which should take precedence given Iran’s current conditions. Adopting this system could enhance fiscal equity, reduce inequality, lower the Gini coefficient, and create a more resilient budget less vulnerable to sanctions and oil price volatility.
Methodology: Given its practical implications for the Iranian National Tax Administration (INTA), this study adopts an applied research approach with a mixed quantitative methodology, utilizing Fuzzy Delphi and MARCOS (Multi-Attribute Ranking and Choice for Optimal Outcomes System) techniques. Initially, 29 implementation requirements were identified through a literature review on comprehensive income taxation in Iran and other countries, supplemented by interviews with tax experts (including academics, researchers, and INTA officials). These requirements were refined using expert surveys and the Fuzzy Delphi method, applying a five-point Likert scale for fuzzification, ultimately narrowing the list to nine high-priority requirements. These were then ranked using the MARCOS decision-making method, evaluated against three criteria:
Expert consensus
Impact level
Required human and financial resources
Results: The analysis identified nine critical requirements for implementation:
Streamlining bureaucratic inefficiencies
Enhancing tax system transparency
Increasing public trust in tax authorities
Mitigating opposition from adversely affected stakeholders
Aligning elite and influential perspectives
Ensuring compliance with national policy frameworks
Establishing robust legal enforcement mechanisms
Developing an integrated data collection and processing system
Strengthening INTA’s technological infrastructure
Using MARCOS, these were ranked with expert consensus and impact level as positive indicators, while resource intensity was a negative factor. The top four priorities were:
Managing adversely affected stakeholders (wealthy individuals likely to resist reform)
Strengthening INTA’s technological infrastructure (essential for accurate income assessment)
Aligning elite and influential perspectives (critical for policy consensus)
Increasing public trust in tax authorities (vital for smooth implementation)
Discussion and Conclusion: Successful implementation hinges on fulfilling these prerequisites, prioritized based on Iran’s specific conditions. Managing opposition from wealthy stakeholders emerged as the top priority, as resistance could obstruct reform. Technological upgrades are essential for efficient income tracking, while elite consensus-building and public trust is crucial for sustainable adoption. Without these measures, even minor implementation challenges could escalate into major crises.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the Research Institute of Hawzah and University "Pazhuheshgāh-e Hāwzeh wa Dāneshgāh", Iran for their support and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this study’s content or findings.
JEL Classification: H24, H61, P43
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1775413
doi: 10.22067/erd.2021.68088.1005
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1667064
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1656824
References
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1775413
https://taxjournal.ir/article-1-770-fa.html
https://joer.atu.ac.ir/article_1823.html?lang=en
https://doi.org/10.1787/8dbf9a62-en.
https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/tax-revenue.html
https://taxjournal.ir/article-1-114-fa.html
https://taxjournal.ir/article-1-55-fa.html
https://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2484-fa.html
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1667064
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1781136
doi: 10.22067/erd.2021.68088.1005
https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1656824
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.TAX.TOTL.GD.ZS?end=2023&start=2008&view=chart
https://taxjournal.ir/article-1-136-fa.html