Components of Social Capital and Economic Growth in Islamic Countries: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach

Authors

1 Department of Economics, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

2 . Department of Economics, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

Extended Abstract
 
Introduction and Objectives: In the last two decades, the attention of researchers and economic policymakers to the role of social capital in explaining differences in economic growth among countries has increased dramatically (Haldane & Halpern, 2025). Social capital, as a multidimensional concept, encompasses mutual relationships between individuals and groups, social trust, social networks, and the level of civic participation, and has a potential and direct impact on the macroeconomic performance of countries (Xue et al., 2023; Jantoń-Drozdowska & Majewska, 2015). Social trust, as one of the main components of social capital, plays an unparalleled role in economic growth by reducing transaction costs and facilitating economic cooperation at various levels (Haldane & Halpern, 2025; Rahimi et al., 2023), thereby paving the way for innovation, knowledge transfer, and the formation of economic investments (Haldane & Halpern, 2025; Xue et al., 2023).
Strong social networks can also optimize human and occupational capital, accelerating the resolution of collective problems, resource exchange, and risk sharing in the economy (Soithong & Suksawas, 2025; Xing et al., 2021). In contrast, perceived corruption is considered an element incompatible with social capital, and societies with high levels of perceived corruption usually face reduced social trust, weak institutions, and decreased investment (Robbani, 2021).
The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of social capital components on the economic growth of selected Islamic countries using a panel quantile regression approach. To achieve this goal, from among the 57 member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a selection of 26 Islamic countries was chosen based on the availability of all required data over the period from 2000 to 2022. The present study also examines controlling factors such as the education index, women’s participation rate, and other control variables, as these factors can have a significant impact on the interaction between social capital and economic growth. Without including them in the models under investigation, economic analyses would be incomplete and sometimes misleading.
Research Method: The independent variables used in this study were selected through an analysis of the theoretical and empirical literature in this field. To investigate the role of social capital components on economic growth, a selection of Islamic countries (including Iran, Iraq, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Benin, Cameroon, Egypt, Gabon, Indonesia, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mali, Morocco, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Yemen) was considered.
The panel quantile regression method was introduced in 1978 by Koenker and Bassett, combining panel data analysis and quantile regression. This method, based on a conditional quantile function, minimizes absolute error values in variables with asymmetric distributions and is today used in numerous economic and financial studies (Afolabi & Ndamsa, 2025). This approach provides valuable insights beyond mean-based analyses, particularly for research focusing on inequality, the behavior of different groups within society, or asymmetric responses (Afolabi & Ndamsa, 2025).
Findings: The estimation results of the panel quantile regression indicate heterogeneous relationships between the explanatory variables and GDP per capita at different levels of the conditional distribution.

Civil Society Participation Index (CSPI): A positive and significant effect (p-value < 0.05) is evident in all quantiles except the 0.75 quantile, indicating the increasing role of civil society in weaker economies (in terms of lower GDP per capita).
Social Trust (ST): Shows a positive and significant effect (p < 0.05) at all quantile levels.
Social Networks Index (SN): Exhibits a dual effect across quantiles.
Corruption Perception (CP): With positive and significant coefficients at the 0.50 Q and 0.75 Q quantiles, confirms the inhibitory effect of corruption on economic growth and performance at medium economic levels.
Women’s Economic Participation Rate (PRF): Shows a uniform positive and significant effect at the 0.05 Q, 0.25 Q, and 0.50 Q quantiles, explaining the peak impact of women’s economic participation in less affluent economies (in terms of GDP per capita). This result emphasizes the importance of women’s economic participation in the early stages of economic growth.
Education Index (ED): Demonstrates a positive and significant effect on GDP per capita in almost all quantiles (except 0.05 Q), indicating the central role of human capital education in medium and high-development economies.
Fertility Rate (FR): Has a negative coefficient at all quantile levels.

Discussion and Conclusion: The main findings of this research indicate that social trust (ST), as the only variable with a positive and significant effect in all quantiles (0.05 to 0.95), plays a fundamental role in facilitating economic cooperation and reducing transaction costs. In contrast, social networks (SN) show a dual behavior: a positive effect in less affluent economies (0.05 quantile) and a negative effect at advanced growth levels (0.95 quantile), likely due to networks transforming into rent-seeking channels in the absence of efficient institutions.
Civil society participation (CSPI) has a stronger reinforcing effect on economic growth, particularly in weaker economies (0.05 quantile). Furthermore, corruption perception (CP) significantly hinders economic growth at intermediate levels (0.50 quantile).
Among the control variables, the Human Development Index (HDI) has its strongest increasing effect in advanced economies (0.95 quantile), indicating the progressive returns on investment in human capital quality at higher stages of development.
Therefore, based on the research findings, the following policy implications are proposed:

Policy-making in less developed OIC member countries should focus on strengthening civil institutions, immediate control of fertility and unemployment rates, and investment in basic education.
Policy-making in OIC member countries with higher economic growth should focus on transferring resources from informal networks to transparent institutions and optimizing investment in human development.

Declarations
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Keywords


منابع
امیری، حسین، نجفی‌نژاد، محمود، موسوی، سیده محدثه، و حسنی، محمدحسین (1399). جریانی از سرمایه اجتماعی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن در ایران. برنامهریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، 11(43)، 89-124. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2020.50732.1957
چراغی، بابک، ترابی، تقی، محمدی، تیمور، و تقوی، مهدی (1398). بررسی عوامل عدم تحقق رشد اقتصادی پایدار از منظر سرمایه اجتماعی در اقتصاد ایران. پژوهشهای رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 9(34)، 77-98. https://doi.org/10.30473/egdr.2018.40618.4846
رحمانی فضلی، هادی، نیکنام، فتانه، آسایش، حمید، و شمس‌اللهی، رضا (1402). تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر رشد اقتصادی: در منتخب کشورهای توسعه‌یافته و در حال توسعه. مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی-اقتصادی، 1(2)، 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22051/ijosed.2024.47502.1041
طهرانچیان، امیر منصور، و خباز، سیده مهسا (1403). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در دوران دفاع مقدس در رشد اقتصادی کشور. همایش ملی بسیج مردم و منابع ملی در دفاع مقدس، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/2308427
کمالی دهکردی، پروانه، نظری زانیانی، علی، مکیان، سید نظام الدین، و دهقانی شاهزاده بیگمی، فاطمه (1398). اثر انواع سرمایه بر رشد اقتصادی استان‎های منتخب ایران. سیاستهای راهبردی و کلان، 7(25)، 58-66. https://doi.org/10.32598/JMSP.7.1.66
معبودی، رضا، دره نظری، زینب (1400). تحلیلی از سهم سرمایه اجتماعی در رشد اقتصادی در ایران طی دوره 1381-1398. مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، 8(4)، 633-663. https://doi.org/10.22059/jscm.2021.331802.2219
Reference
Afolabi, A. C., & Ndamsa, D. T. (2025). Revisiting the impact of trade integration on poverty reduction in ECOWAS: A panel quantile regression analysis. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2025.2459912
Amin, M. (2024). The influence of social capital, human capital, and natural capital on economic growth and community welfare. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(3), 528-535. https://doi.org/10.29210/020242709
Amiri, H., Najafī-Nejād, M., Mousavī, S. M., & Hassanī, M. H. (1399 [2020/2021]). Jarīānī az Sarmāyah-yi Ijtimā‘ī va ‘Avāmil-i Mu’athir bar Ān dar Īrān [A stream of social capital and factors affecting it in Iran]. Barnāmah-rīzī-yi Rafāh va Tawsi‘ah-yi Ijtimā‘ī, 11(43), 89-124. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2020.50732.1957 [In Persian]
Bah, I. A. (2023). The relationship between education and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. Research, Society and Development, 12(5), e19312540522-e19312540522. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.40522
Brown, A. D. (2024). Social capital, trust(s), corruption, and public attitudes toward immigrants: Evidence from East and Southeast Asia. Journal of Global and Area Studies, 8(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.31720/jga.8.2.1
Burt, R. S. (2009). The contingent value of social capital. In Knowledge and social capital (pp. 255-286). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393923
Carey, I. (2024). A study of the impact of social trust on economic growth and defining a potential threshold for ‘high trust’ in economic research. https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/econ_studt_schol/170
Cheraghī, B., Torābī, T., Mohammadī, T., & Taqavī, M. (1398 [2019/2020]). Barrisī-yi ‘Avāmil-i ‘Adam-i Taḥaqquq-i Rushd-i Iqtisādī-yi Pāydār az Manẓar-i Sarmāyah-yi Ijtimā‘ī dar Iqtisād-i Īrān [Investigating the factors of unsustainable economic growth from the perspective of social capital in Iran]. Pazhūhish-hā-yi Rushd va Tawsi‘ah-yi Iqtisādī, 9(34), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.30473/egdr.2018.40618.4846 [In Persian]
Doğan, B., & Akyüz, M. (2017). Female labor force participation rate and economic growth in the framework of Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Turkey. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 10(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/rebs-2017-0047
Dunaev, B. B. (2025). Inflation dynamics in the country’s economy. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 61(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-025-00748-0
Francois, P., & Zabojnik, J. (2005). Trust, social capital, and economic development. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(1), 51-94. https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476053295304
Haldane, A., & Halpern, D. (2025). Social capital 2025: The hidden wealth of nations. https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Social-Capital-2025_The-Hidden-Wealth-of-Nations.pdf
Hanushek, E. A. (2013). Economic growth in developing countries: The role of human capital. Economics of Education Review, 37, 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.005
Integrated Values Surveys. (2024). Share of people agreeing with the statement “most people can be trusted” – Integrated Values Surveys [Dataset]. Retrieved July 12, 2025 from https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20250701-112923/grapher/self-reported-trust-attitudes.html (archived on July 1, 2025)
Iyer, S., Kitson, M., & Toh, B. (2005). Social capital, economic growth and regional development. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1015-1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500327943
Jantoń-Drozdowska, E., & Majewska, M. (2015). Social capital as a key driver of productivity growth of the economy: Across-countries comparison. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 10(4), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.12775/equil.2015.035
Jha, J., & Kelley, E. J. (2023). Returns to relationships: Social capital and household welfare in India. Social Sciences, 12(3), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030184
Kamalī-Dehkordī, P., Narī Zānīānī, A., Makīān, S. N., & Dehghānī Shāhzādah Baygumī, F. (1398 [2019/2020]). Asar-i Anvā‘-i Sarmāyah bar Rushd-i Iqtisādī-yi Ustānhā-yi Muntakhab-i Īrān [The effect of different types of capital on the economic growth of selected provinces of Iran]. Sīyast-hā-yi Rāhbardī va Kalān, 7(25), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.32598/JMSP.7.1.66 [In Persian]
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447
Lin, N., Cook, K. S., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.). (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. Transaction Publishers.
Maboodī, R., & Darreh Nazarī, Z. (1400 [2021/2022]). Taḥlīlī az Sahm-i Sarmāyah-yi Ijtimā‘ī dar Rushd-i Iqtisādī dar Īrān Ṭī-yi Dawrah-yi 1381-1398 [An analysis of the contribution of social capital to economic growth in Iran during the period 2002-2019]. Modīriyyat-i Sarmāyah-yi Ijtimā‘ī, 8(4), 633-663. https://doi.org/10.22059/jscm.2021.331802.2219 [In Persian]
Mauro, L., Pigliaru, F., & Carmeci, G. (2023). Decentralization, social capital, and regional growth: The case of the Italian North-South divide. European Journal of Political Economy, 78, 102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102363
Mohammadi, H., & Mahmoudi, M. (2017). Reviews of mutual interest rate effects to macroeconomic variables in Islamic and un-Islamic countries. Journal of Economic Modeling Research - Kharazmi University, 8(28), 103-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jemr.7.28.103
Mustafa, G., & Bano, N. (2020). The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): Challenges for the Islamic World. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2020(1-I)1
Notolegowo, H. K., & Saleh, S. (2019). Social capital and economic growth: Empirical evidence from OIC countries. AL-IQTISHAD: Journal of Islamic Economics, 11(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v11i2.10931
Pilatin, A., & Hacıimamoğlu, T. (2023). The relationship between social capital and economic growth on a provincial and regional basis. Economics and Business Review, 9(3), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.3.799
Pons, M., & Melly, B. (2022). Stata commands to estimate quantile regression with panel and grouped data. In Swiss Stata Conference 2022 (No. 05). Stata Users Group. http://repec.org/csug2022/Melly-Bern2022-mdqr.pdf
Ponzetto, G. A., & Troiano, U. A. (2025). Social capital, government expenditures, and growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 23(2), 632-681. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae043
Portes, A. (2024). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. In New critical writings in political sociology (pp. 53-76). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003572923-6
Rahimi, A., Garshasbi Fakhr, S. G. F., & Asayesh, H. (2023). Effect of trust on economic growth in selected countries with high and low levels of corruption. International Journal of New Political Economy, 4(2), 173-195. https://doi.org/10.48308/jep.4.2.173
 
Rahmānī Fażlī, H., Nīknām, F., Āsāyesh, H., & Shamsollāhī, R. (1402 [2023/2024]). Ta’thīr-i Sarmāyah-yi Ijtimā‘ī bar Rushd-i Iqtisādī: Dar Muntakhab-i Kishvar-hā-yi Tawsi‘ah Yāftah va Dar Ḥāl-i Tawsi‘ah [The impact of social capital on economic growth: In selected developed and developing countries]. Muāli‘āt-i Tawsi‘ah-yi Ijtimā‘ī-Iqtisādī, 1(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22051/ijosed.2024.47502.1041 [In Persian]
Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2023). Internet. OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/internet
Robbani, D. (2021). The effect of FDI and corruption to human development in OIC countries. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v15i1.265
Rusfiana, Y., & Kurniasih, D. (2024). The role of civil society organizations in promoting social and political change in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2154
Slingerland, W. (2021). Social capital, corrupt networks, and network corruption. In Corruption networks: Concepts and applications (pp. 9-27). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81484-7_2
Soithong, P., & Suksawas, W. (2025). Harnessing social capital for inclusive growth: Lessons from Wang Itok, Phitsanulok. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 18(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.69650/jcdrhs.2025.832
Solarin, S., Kilic, C., Akcan, A. T., & Kazak, H. (2025). The role of ICT, human capital and economic growth on sustainable forest management: Evidence from panel cointegration and Fourier causality tests. International Forestry Review, 27(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554825839764931
Song, J. S., Ngnouwal Eloundou, G., Bitoto Ewolo, F., & Ondoua Beyene, B. (2024). Does social media contribute to economic growth? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 8349-8389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01419-1
Sulaeman, S., & Ninglasari, S. Y. (2022). The nexus between financial inclusion and economic growth in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries. Journal of Business and Political Economy: Biannual Review of the Indonesian Economy, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.46851/132
Tehrānchīān, A. M., & Khabbāz, S. M. (1403 [2024/2025]). Naqsh-i Sarmāyah-yi Ijtimā‘ī dar Dawrān-i Difā‘-i Muqaddas dar Rushd-i Iqtisādī-yi Kishvar [The role of social capital during the Sacred Defense era in the economic growth of the country]. Hamāyish-i Millī-yi Basīj-i Mardum va Manābi‘-i Millī dar Difā‘-i Muqaddas, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/2308427 [In Persian]
UNDP, Human Development Report. (2025). Average years of schooling – UNDP [Dataset]. Retrieved July 12, 2025 from https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20250624-125417/grapher/average-years-of-schooling.html (archived on June 24, 2025)
V-Dem. (2025). Civil society participation index – V-Dem [Dataset]. Retrieved July 12, 2025 from https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20250710-194922/grapher/civil-society-participation-index.html (archived on July 10, 2025)
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
Xing, L., Ai, X., Ren, J., & Wang, D. (2021). Network-based driving force of national economic development: A social capital perspective. Entropy, 23(10), 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23101276
Xue, X., Reed, W. R., & van Aert, R. C. (2023). Social capital and economic growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12660
Zhao, J., Li, Q., & Hu, X. (2025). Dynamic effects of education investment on sustainable development based on comparative empirical research between China and the United States. Sustainability, 17(7), 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073068